Simultaneous Estimation of Atorvastatin Calcium and Clopidogrel Bisulphate Using Multicomponent Method
Arvind R. Umarkar* Sachin D. Raut, Niki S. Rewatkar, Lokesh T. Thote, Bhavana D. Kalaskar
J. L. Chaturvedi College of Pharmacy, Electronic Zone Building MIDC Hingna Road Nagpur., Nagpur 440016 M.S. India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: arumarkar@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A new simple, specific, precise and accurate Multicomponent method has been developed for simultaneous estimation of Atorvastatin Calcium (ATOR) and Clopidogrel Bisulphate (CLOP) in tablet formulation. The detection of the constituents was done using UV detector at 219,225,232,237,246 for ATOR and CLOP. Recovery, study values of ATOR and CLOP is 100.04±0.34 and 98.99±0.27 respectively, relative standard deviation of less than 2% for the assay and linearity coefficient of 0.9998 that the method is precise, accurate and linear in the concentration given and demonstrated the method developed is rugged. Liner response obtained for ATOR was in the concentration range 20-100µg/mL and CLOP in the range 20-100 µg/mL.
KEYWORDS: Atorvastatin Calcium, Clopidogrel Bisulphate, Multicomponent.
INTRODUCTION:
Atrovastatin Calcium (fig.1a) chemically it is 2-(4-flurorophenyl) β, δ-dihydroxy-5-isopropyl-3-phenyl-4-(phenylamino) carbonyl-1H-Pyrrole-1-heptanoic acid trihydrate calcium salt[1,2,3]. It is a synthetic lipid lowering agent and an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate, an early and rate limiting stage in cholesterol biosynthesis.
Clopidogrel Bisulphate (fig.1b) chemically it is Methyl (2-chlorophenyl) (4, 5, 6, 7-tetrahydrothieno [3, 2 c] pyridin-5(4H)-yl) acetate bisulphate.[4,5]it belonging to the category Anti-platelet Drug. Due to opening of the thiophene ring, the metabolite chemical structure now has three sites of chirality, making a total of eight possible isomers. These are; a stereocentre at C4 (attached to the —SH thiol group), a stereobond at C3—C16 double bound and the original stereocentre at C7. Only one of the eight structures is an active antiplatelet drug. As the thiol group is too reactive, work with the active metabolite of the related drug Prasugrel suggests that the (R)-configuration of the C4 group is critical for P2Y12 and platelet-inhibitory activities.
Literature survey reveals that Spectrophotometric HPLC, RP-HPLC methods are available for determination of Atrovastatin Calcium from pharmaceutical preparations and biological formulation More ever, the literature survey revealed that so far, no method has been reported for estimation of ATOR and CLOP in combined dosage form, hence U V Spectrophotometric methods have been developed for simultaneous estimation of ATOR and CLOP in capsule dosage form by Multicomponent method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials:
All the chemicals and solvents used were of AR. The pure drugs ATOR (99.91 %) and CLOP (99.50%) were gift sample from vama pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur, and were used as reference standards. The capsule formulation was purchased from local market and it was coded by the symbol C and used for analysis.
Methods:
The sampling wavelengths 219,225,232,237,246 nm were selected on trial and error basis. The concentrations of individual drug (i.e. ATOR and CLOP) in the respective six mixed standard solutions (Table 10) were feed to multicomponent mode of the instrument. All the six mixed standards were scanned in the range of 200 nm to290 nm
The basic necessity for the application of the proposed method is that at all the selected sampling wavelengths the mixed standard solutions must follow the Beer-Lambert’s law. The study shows that at all the selected sampling wavelengths, the mixed standard solutions obey the Beer-Lambert’s law.
(fig.1a) Atrovastatin Calcium
(fig.1b) Clopidogrel Bisulphate
Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulation:
For the simultaneous estimation of commercial formulation twenty capsule of ATOR (Labail claim: Atrovastatin Calcium and Clopidogrel Bisulphate) was taken. The average weight of capsule was determined. powder equivalent to 10 mg ATOR was accurately weighed, transferred to a 10 ml volumetric flask, dissolved in 10ml solvent for 20 minutes with vigorous shaking. Finally the volume was made-up to the mark with solvent. The solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper-41, first few drops were rejected. The filtrate was then appropriately diluted to get final concentration of 2 _g/ml of and 5 _g/ml of ATOR. Absorbance of this solution was measured at appropriate wavelengths and values were substituted in the respective formula to obtain concentration. The result of analysis was mentioned in Table 2.
Table 1:- Range for mixture
|
Name of drug |
Concentration in (µg/mL) |
|||||
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
ATOR |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
CLOP |
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
Validation of the proposed method:
a) Accuracy: - Accuracy of the proposed method was ascertained on the basis of recovery studies performed by Standard addition method. The procedure for mixed standard solution is same as given in Table4.
b) Precision: - It is expressed as ±SD and % RSD of any measurements. Precision of estimation of ATOR and CLOP by proposed method was ascertained by replicate analysis of homogenous samples of tablet powder. The results are also shown in Table 3.
c) Linearity and range: - The study was performed over the series of concentrations ranging from 2-10 µg/mL for mixture. The graphs of concentration against absorbance (Fig.5) found to be straight line over the concentration range of these range.
d) Ruggedness: - The studies were carried out for different parameters i.e. different elapsed times (intraday and interday) different analysts.
Fig 1. Linearity graph of mixture at five selected wavelength
Table 2:- Analysis of standard laboratory mixture
|
S. No. |
Amount of drugs taken (µg/mL) |
Amount of drug estimated (µg/mL ) |
% of drugs estimated. |
|||
|
ATOR |
CLOP |
ATOR |
CLOP |
ATOR |
CLOP |
|
|
1 |
2 |
4 |
1.99 |
3.98 |
99.5 |
99 |
|
2 |
3 |
6 |
2.97 |
5.99 |
99.25 |
99.75 |
|
3 |
4 |
8 |
3.96 |
7.89 |
99.33 |
98.16 |
|
4 |
5 |
10 |
4.98 |
9.99 |
99.75 |
99.87 |
|
5 |
6 |
12 |
5.94 |
11.96 |
99.4 |
99.6 |
Statistics
|
Drug |
Mean |
± SD |
%RSD |
|
ATOR |
99.44 |
0.193 |
0.194 |
|
CLOP |
99.27 |
0.707 |
0.712 |
Table 3. Analysis Data of Tablet Formulation
|
S. No. |
Amount of capsule powder taken (µg/mL) |
Amount of drug estimated ( µg/mL) |
% of labeled claim |
||
|
ATOR |
CLOP |
ATOR |
CLOP |
||
|
1 |
10 |
10.02 |
10.12 |
100.01 |
100.23 |
|
2 |
10 |
9.86 |
9.84 |
99.24 |
99.20 |
|
3 |
10 |
9.90 |
10.02 |
98.67 |
100.01 |
|
4 |
10 |
10.15 |
10.00 |
100.08 |
100.00 |
Statistics
|
Drug |
Mean |
± SD |
%RSD |
|
ATOR |
99.49 |
51.87 |
1.912 |
|
CLOP |
99.86 |
52.048 |
1.913 |
Recovery Study:
To check the accuracy of the developed methods and to study the interference of formulation additives, analytical recovery experiment was carried out by standard addition method. From the total amount of drug found, the percentage recovery was calculated. The results are reported in Table 5.
Table 4- Results of ruggedness studies
|
Drugs |
Parameter |
Method precision |
Intermediate Precision |
||
|
|
Interday |
Intraday |
Different Analysts |
||
|
ATOR |
Mean ± SD |
99.18 ±1.2945 |
98.15 ± 1.124 |
99.91 ± 1.350 |
100.5 ± 0.912 |
|
% RSD |
1.2857 |
1.145 |
1.364 |
0.907 |
|
|
CLOP |
Mean ± SD |
99.91 ±0.5635 |
99.83 ± 1.004 |
98.74 1.675 |
99.78 ± 0.473 |
|
% RSD |
0.5639 |
1.005 |
1.696 |
0.474 |
|
Table 5. Recovery Studies
|
S.N. |
Amount of drugs added (µg/mL) |
Amount of drugs recovered (µg/mL) |
% of drugs recovered |
|||
|
|
ATOR |
CLOP |
ATOR |
CLOP |
ATOR |
CLOP |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
100 |
100 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
1.97 |
1.99 |
98.5 |
99.5 |
|
3 |
2 |
2 |
1.98 |
1.96 |
99 |
98 |
|
4 |
2 |
2 |
1.99 |
1.98 |
99.5 |
99 |
Statistic
|
Drug |
Mean |
± SD |
% RSD |
|
ATOR |
99.25 |
0.6454 |
0.650 |
|
CLOP |
99.21 |
0.8539 |
0.860 |
* Recovery is mean of five estimation. Method Multicompanant method while Method 2 is simultaneous equation method and R.S.D is the relative standard deviation.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
The UV Spectrophotometric methods were found to be simple, accurate, economic and rapid for routine simultaneous estimation of ATOR and CLOP, in tablet dosage forms, linearity was obtained in concentration range of 2-40 μg/ml for ATOR and CLOP respectively. Both the drug show good regression values at there respective wavelengths. Recovery was in the range of 99-101%; the value of standard deviation and % R. S. D are found to be < 2%; shows the high precession of the method.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:-
The authors are thankful to head J.L. Chaturvedi College of Pharmacy Electronic Zone building MIDC Hingna road Nagpur for providing laboratory facilities. Authors are also thankful Vama Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd for providing the gift sample of pure drug.
REFERENCE:-
1. The Merck Index, 14th ed., Merck and Co. Inc., Whitehouse Station NJ 1997, p.160.
2. The Merck Index, 14th ed., Merck and Co. Inc., Whitehouse Station NJ 1997, p.3949.
3. R. Sahu, and Patel V.B., Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium from their binary mixture by dual wavelength and zero absorbance measurement, Indian Drugs, 2006, 43(2), 160-161.
4. R. Sahu, and Patel V.B., Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of amlodipine besylate and atorvastatin calcium from their binary mixture, Indian Journal of Pharm. Sci., 2007, 69 (1), 110-111.
5. Sonawane S. S., Shirkhedkar A.A., Fursule R. A. and Surana S. J., Application of UVSpectrophotometry and RP-HPLC for simultaneous determination of atorvastatin calcium and ezetimibe in pharmaceutical dosag
Received on 02.03.2011 Modified on 23.03.2011
Accepted on 12.04.2011 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 4(6): June, 2011; Page 960-962